![]() ![]() Causing potential differences in product flavour, colouring, and microbiological product safety, affecting shelf life. If you inject with a bent needle, that needle might penetrate the same place so you are injecting double, which would mean your brine dispersion is not optimum. This is especially important for brine dispersion. So, that’s a major benefit for the product. If the needle is bent, when it goes down it will not inject in the same place that it should. When we look at the product, because the needle returns to its shape, it will always inject in the same position. ![]() First: the product that is being injected, second, the machine, and third, the operator. Wim Sturm: There are three things to consider. Wim Sturm, Product Sales Manager at GEA Food Solutions In comparison to similar needles in the same application, OptiFlex are between 40-60% more durable. Since OptiFlex needles are more resistant to damage from bending, does this mean a longer operational life? Further, after extraction of the needle, it will return to its original shape. Our Optiflex needle will deflect it, and not harm the product. With standard regular stainless-steel needles, if the bend is too large, it stays in that position. Optiflex needles have ‘shape memory.’ When you are injecting, and specifically for boned products, the needle can be deflected from the bone, and you get a bend in the needle. ![]() Wim Sturm: What makes them unique is the patented metal alloy that is used. You describe GEA Optiflex needles as a “major step forward in injection quality.” How are Optiflex needles different? Here, Wim Sturm, Product Sales Manager at GEA Food Solutions, addresses the advantages for operators using OptiFlex. Please check your email to download the Whitepaper. Comfort remained consistent with baseline levels throughout the study regardless of concentration of DPR for 72 of 73 subjects.This study provided evidence that the daily use of a low concentration pancreatin enzymatic solution admixed with multifunctional solution is well tolerated and provides a more convenient method of achieving simultaneous disinfection and protein cleaning during contact lens storage than enzyme tablets.Thank you. Thus, subjects perceived the DPR regimen as more convenient than their pre-study regimen, which required weekly use of an enzymatic cleaning tablet. Three convenience parameters (steps required, time required, and dexterity required) had mean improvements for both regimens at Day 90 compared to baseline (Day 0). The aim of this study was to compare the relative safety, efficacy, comfort, and convenience of the daily use of a pancreatin-based, liquid enzyme daily protein remover (DPR) at two different concentrations for protein cleaning of Group IV disposable contact lenses.We enrolled 73 subjects (146 eyes) into a 3-month, randomized, investigator-masked clinical study comparing a test regimen of DPR (Opti-Plus(R) or Supra-Clens(R)) containing four drops per 10 mL of multifunctional solution (Opti-Free(R)) to a control regimen containing only two drops per 10 mL of multifunctional solution.The liquid enzyme regimens provided safe and effective protein cleaning of the Group IV lenses with no additional cleaning benefit observed at the higher concentration. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |